The FA Community Shield — the traditional curtain-raiser between the Premier League champions and FA Cup winners — could soon be played in the United States, sparking fierce debate among fans, pundits, and former players.
Traditionally held at Wembley Stadium, the Community Shield is seen as a celebration of English football heritage. However, with nearly half of Premier League clubs — including Arsenal, Manchester United, Liverpool, Chelsea, Aston Villa, Bournemouth, Everton, Fulham, and Crystal Palace — under majority American ownership, the push for overseas matches is growing stronger. Supporters of the idea believe the move could boost the league’s global profile, attract new sponsors, and generate significant revenue.
Former Crystal Palace owner Simon Jordan, ex-Chelsea defender Scott Minto, and broadcaster Flex discussed the proposal on talkSPORT Daily. While some see it as a smart commercial opportunity, others argue it would punish loyal domestic fans, forcing them to travel thousands of miles to witness a match that has always been played in England.
Critics also warn of the Americanization of English football, citing examples like proposed halftime shows and overseas league fixtures. They fear the Community Shield could be the first step toward Premier League regular-season games abroad, including the controversial “39th game” concept.
Proponents point out that preseason tours already take clubs to the USA, Asia, and beyond without disrupting domestic fixtures. They argue that the Community Shield — often considered the least significant domestic trophy — could be used for international expansion without major competitive impact.
For now, the FA Community Shield 2025 remains at Wembley, but with the Premier League’s brand stronger than ever in North America, many believe it’s only a matter of time before the match is staged in the USA.